RESEARCH PAPER
Luminescence Dating of Neolithic Ceramics from Lumea Nouă, Romania
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Environmental Science, Babes-Bolyai University, Piata Stefan Cel Mare 4, RO-400192 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
 
2
Laboratory of Mineralogy and Petrology (Luminescence Research Group), Geological Institute (S8), Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281, B-9000 Gent, Belgium
 
3
Systemic Archaeology Institute, 1 Decembrie 1918 University, Mihai Viteazul 12, RO-510010, Alba Iulia, Romania
 
 
Online publication date: 2007-10-29
 
 
Publication date: 2007-12-01
 
 
Geochronometria 2007;28:9-16
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Luminescence dating was applied to four Neolithic pottery fragments excavated at Lumea Nouă (Alba Iulia, Romania), with the purpose of improving the chronology for the archaeological finds, and hence, the occupational history of the site. The single-aliquot regenerative-dose (SAR) protocol was applied to both blue and infrared stimulated luminescence signals from coarse quartz and polymineral fine grains, respectively. A more conventional approach which uses a multiple-aliquot additive-dose protocol and thermoluminescence signals from polymineral fine grains was applied as well. The characteristics of the OSL and IRSL signals were investigated in terms of behaviour in the SAR protocol, dose response and dose recovery. Additionally, anomalous fading measurements of the 410 nm IRSL emission and of the blue TL emission from polymineral fine-grains were performed. Both signals were observed to be affected by anomalous fading. OSL dating of quartz using the SAR protocol is considered to be the technique of choice; it yields an average age of 6.0±0.4 ka (n = 4), which is in agreement with archaeological expectations. The dating results allow refining the typological interpretation of the objects and improve the chronological framework for the site.
REFERENCES (27)
1.
Adamiec G and Aitken M, 1998. Dose-rate conversion factors: update. Ancient TL 16:37-50.
 
2.
Aitken MJ, 1985. Thermoluminescence Dating. London. Academic Press, ISBN: 0-12-046380-6: 359pp.
 
3.
Aitken MJ, 1976. Thermoluminescent age evaluation and assessment of error limits: revised system. Archaeometry 18(2): 233-238, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4754.1976.tb00168.x.10.1111/j.1475-4754.1976.tb00168.x.
 
4.
Aitken MJ and Alldred JC, 1972. The assessment of error limits in thermoluminescent dating. Archaeometry 14(2): 257-267, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4754.1972.tb00068.x.10.1111/j.1475-4754.1972.tb00068.x.
 
5.
Auclair M, Lamothe M and Huot S, 2003. Measurement of anomalous fading for feldspars IRSL using SAR. Radiation Measurements 37(4-5): 487-492, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(03)00018-0.10.1016/S1350-4487(03)00018-0.
 
6.
Blair MV, Yukihara EG and McKeever SWS, 2005. Experiences with single aliquot OSL procedures using coarse-grain feldspars. Radiation Measurements 39(4): 361-374, DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas.2004.05.008.10.1016/j.radmeas.2004.05.008.
 
7.
Bøtter-Jensen L, Andersen CE, Duller GAT and Murray AS, 2003. Developments in radiation, stimulation and observation facilities in luminescence measurements. Radiation Measurements 37(4-5): 535-541, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(03)00020-9.10.1016/S1350-4487(03)00020-9.
 
8.
De Corte F, 1987. The k0 standardization method: A move to the optimization of neutron activation analysis. Rijksuniversiteit Report to Aggregate Thesis, Ghent University, 464pp.
 
9.
Draşovean F, 2005. Zona thessalo-macedoneană şi Dunărea mijlocie la sfârşitul mileniului al VI-lea şi la începutul mileniului al V-lea A. CHR. (Thessalo Macedonian and Danube region at the end of sixth millennium, beginning of fifth millennium BC). Apulum XLII: 12-26 (in Romanian).
 
10.
Frechen M, Schweitzer U and Zander A, 1996. Improvements in sample preparation for the fine grain technique. Ancient TL 14: 15-17.
 
11.
Gligor M, 2006. Consideraţii privitoare la neoliticul târziu/eneoliticul timpuriu din S-V Transilvaniei. Materiale ceramice de la Alba Iulia-Lumea Nouă. (Considerations regarding late Neolithic/ Early Aeneolithic in S-V of Transylvania. Ceramic materials discovered at Alba Iulia- Lumea Noua). ApulumXLIII(1): 9-34 (in Romanian).
 
12.
Grogler N, Houtermans FG and Stauffer H, 1960. Ueber die Datierung von Keramik und Ziegel durch Thermolumineszenz. Helvetica Physica Acta 33: 595-596.
 
13.
Hong DG, Yi SB, Galloway RB and Tsuboi T, 2001. Optical dating of archaeological samples using a single aliquot of quartz stimulated by blue light. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 247(1): 179-184, DOI 10.1023/A:1006704207173.10.1023/A:1006704207173.
 
14.
Hossain SM, De Corte F, Vandenberge D and Van den Haute P, 2002. A comparison of methods for annual radiation dose determination in the luminescence dating of loess sediments. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 490(3): 598-613, DOI 10.1016/S0168-9002(02)01078-1.10.1016/S0168-9002(02)01078-1.
 
15.
Huntley DJ and Lamothe M, 2001. Ubiquity of anomalous fading in K-feldspars and the measurement and correction for it in optical dating. Canadian Journal of Earth Science 38: 1093-1106.10.1139/e01-013.
 
16.
Kennedy GC and Knopff L, 1960. Dating by thermoluminescence. Archaeology 13: 147-148.
 
17.
Lamothe M, 2004. Optical dating of pottery, burnt stones, and sediments from selected Quebec archaeological sites. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 41: 659-667.10.1139/e04-032.
 
18.
McIntosh G and Catanzariti G, 2006. An introduction to archaeomagnetic dating. Geochronometria 25: 11-18.
 
19.
Mejdahl V, 1979. Thermoluminescence dating: beta dose attenuation in quartz grains. Archaeometry 21(1): 61-72, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4754.1979.tb00241.x.10.1111/j.1475-4754.1979.tb00241.x.
 
20.
Murray AS and Wintle AG, 2000. Luminescence dating using an improved single-aliquot regenerative-dose protocol. Radiation Measurements 32(1): 57-73, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00253-X.10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00253-X.
 
21.
Murray AS and Wintle AG, 2003. The single aliquot regenerative dose protocol: potential for improvements in reliability. Radiation Measurements 37(4-5): 377-381, DOI 10.1016/S1350- 4487(03)00053-2.10.1016/S1350-4487(03)00053-2.
 
22.
Paul I, 1992. Cultura Petreşti (Petresti Culture). Bucureşti, Museion Publishing House (in Romanian), 205 pp.
 
23.
Prescott JR and Hutton JT, 1994. Cosmic ray contributions to dose rates for luminescence and ESR dating: large depths and long-term time variations. Radiation Measurements 23(2-3): 497-500, DOI 10.1016/1350-4487(94)90086-8.10.1016/1350-4487(94)90086-8.
 
24.
Roberts RG, 1997. Luminescence dating in archaeology: from origins to optical. Radiation Measurements 27(5-6): 819-892, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(97)00221-7.10.1016/S1350-4487(97)00221-7.
 
25.
Takano M, Yawata T and Hahimoto T, 2003. Luminescence dosimetry of archaeological and ceramic samples using a single- aliquot regenerative dose method. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 255(2): 365-368, DOI 10.1023/A:1022521224134.10.1023/A:1022521224134.
 
26.
Vandenberghe D, 2004. Investigation of the optically stimulated luminescence dating method for application to young geological sediments. PhD thesis, Ghent University: 358pp.
 
27.
Zimmerman DW, 1971. Thermoluminescence dating using fine grains from pottery. Archaeometry 13(1): 29-52, DOI 10.1111/j.1475- 4754.1971.tb00028.x.10.1111/j.1475-4754.1971.tb00028.x.
 
eISSN:1897-1695
ISSN:1733-8387
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top