RESEARCH PAPER
Residual doses and sensitivity change of post IR IRSL signals from potassium feldspar under different bleaching conditions
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Earth Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China
2
Centre for Archaeological Science, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia
Online publication date: 2013-09-27
Publication date: 2013-12-01
Geochronometria 2013;40(4):229-238
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The residual doses and sensitivity change for potassium-rich feldspar (K-feldspar) have been studied using the post-infrared infrared stimulated luminescence (pIRIR) and multi-elevated-temperature post-IR IRSL (MET-pIRIR) protocols. Laboratory simulated poorly-bleached and well-bleached samples were those K-feldspar grains bleached using a solar simulator for 10 minutes and 8 hours, respectively. The residual doses rise with stimulation temperature and time. The poorly-bleached sample has larger residual doses than the well-bleached sample, especially at high stimulation temperatures. The high-temperature pIRIR signals contain a large amount of hard-to-bleach signals. A decrease of luminescence sensitivity was observed after conducting a high-temperature-treatment in the measurement cycles. The sensitivity decreases significantly between the first and the second cycle. The extent of decrease in sensitivity shows a clear temperature trend. The higher the stimulation temperature of pIRIR signals is, the larger the sensitivity decreases. This decrease is more severe for the poorly-bleached sample than for the well-bleached sample, and could possibly lead to problems in sensitivity correction.
REFERENCES (27)
1.
Aitken MJ, 1998. An Introduction to Optical Dating. Oxford, Oxford University Press: 359pp.
2.
Bøtter-Jensen L, Bulur E, Duller GAT and Murray AS, 2000. Advances in luminescence instrument systems. Radiation Measurements 32(5–6): 523–528, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00039-1.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S135....
3.
Buylaert JP, Murray AS, Thomsen KJ and Jain M, 2009. Testing the potential of an elevated temperature IRSL signal from K-feldspar. Radiation Measurements 44(5–6): 560–565, DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas.2009.02.007.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ra....
4.
Buylaert JP, Jain M, Murray AS, Thomsen KJ, Thiel C and Sohbati R, 2012. A robust feldspar luminescence dating method for Middle and Late Pleistocene sediments. Boreas 41(3): 435–451, DOI 10.1111/j.1502-3885.2012.00248.x.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.15....
5.
Fu X, Li B and Li SH, 2012. Testing a multi-step post-IR IRSL dating method using polymineral fine grains from Chinese loess. Quaternary Geochronology 10: 8–15, DOI 10.1016/j.quageo.2011.12.004.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.qu....
6.
Fu X and Li SH, 2013. A modified multi-elevated-temperature post-IR IRSL protocol for dating of Holocene sediments using K-feldspar. Quaternary Geochronology 17: 44–54, DOI 10.1016/j.quageo.2013.02.004.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.qu....
7.
Huntley DJ and Lamothe M, 2001. Ubiquity of anomalous fading in K-feldspars and the measurement and correction for it in optical dating. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 38(7): 1093–1106, DOI 10.1139/cjes-38-7-1093.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/e01-....
8.
Li B and Li SH, 2011. Luminescence dating of K-feldspar from sediments: A protocol without anomalous fading correction. Quaternary Geochronology 6(5): 468–479, DOI 10.1016/j.quageo.2011.05.001.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.qu....
9.
Li B and Li SH, 2012a. A reply to the comments by Thomsen et al. on “Luminescence dating of K-feldspar from sediments: A protocol without anomalous fading correction”. Quaternary Geochronology 8: 49–51, DOI 10.1016/j.quageo.2011.10.001.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.qu....
10.
Li B and Li SH, 2012b. Luminescence dating of Chinese loess beyond 130 ka using the non-fading signal from K-feldspar. Quaternary Geochronology 10: 24–31, DOI 10.1016/j.quageo.2011.12.005.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.qu....
11.
Li B, Robert RG and Jacobs Z, 2013a. On the dose dependency of the bleachable and non-bleachable components of IRSL from K-feldspar: improved procedures for luminescence dating of Quaternary sediments. Quaternary Geochronology 17: 1–13, DOI 10.1016/j.quageo.2013.03.006.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.qu....
12.
Li B, Robert RG, Jacobs Z and Li SH, 2013b. Extending the age limit of luminescence dating using the dose-dependent sensitivity of MET-pIRIR signals from K-feldspar. Quaternary Geochronology 17: 55–67, DOI 10.1016/j.quageo.2013.02.003.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.qu....
13.
Li SH and Wintle AG, 1992. Luminescence sensitivity changes due to bleaching of sediments. Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurements 20(4): 567–573, DOI 10.1016/1359-0189(92)90006-H.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1359....
14.
Madsen AT, Buylaert JP and Murray AS, 2011. Luminescence dating of young coastal deposits from New Zealand using feldspar. Geochronometria 38(4): 378–390, DOI 10.2478/s13386-011-0042-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s133....
15.
Murray AS and Wintle AG, 2000. Luminescence dating of quartz using an improved single-aliquot regenerative-dose protocol. Radiation Measurements 32(1): 57–73, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00253-X.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S135....
16.
Reimann T, Tsukamoto S, Naumann M and Frechen M, 2011. The potential of using K-rick feldspars for optical dating of young coastal sediments-A test case from Darss-Zingst peninsula (southern Baltic Sea coast). Quaternary Geochronology 6: 207–222, DOI 10.1016/j.quageo.2010.10.001.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.qu....
17.
Reimann T, Thomsen KJ, Jain M, Murray AS and Frechen M, 2012. Single-grain dating of young sediments using the pIRIR signal from feldspar. Quaternary Geochronology 11: 28–41, DOI 10.1016/j.quageo.2012.04.016.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.qu....
18.
Reimann T and Tsukamoto S, 2012. Dating the recent past (<500 years) by post-IR IRSL feldspar — Examples from the North Sea and Bal-tic Sea coast. Quaternary Geochronology 10: 180–187, DOI 10.1016/j.quageo.2012.04.016.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.qu....
19.
Richardson CA, 1994. Effects of bleaching on the sensitivity to dose of the infrared stimulated luminescence of potassium-rich feldspars from Ynyslas, Wales. Radiation Measurements 23(2–3): 587–591, DOI 10.1016/1350-4487(94)90104-X.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1350....
20.
Singhvi AK, Stokes SC, Chauhan N, Nagar YC and Jaiswal MK, 2011. Changes in natural OSL sensitivity during single aliquot regeneration procedure and their implications for equivalent dose determi-nation. Geochronometria 38(3): 231–241, DOI 10.2478/s13386-011-0028-3.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s133....
21.
Spooner NA, 1994. The anomalous fading of infrared-stimulated luminescence from feldspars. Radiation Measurements 23(2–3): 625–632, DOI 10.1016/1350-4487(94)90111-2.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1350....
22.
Thiel C, Buylaert JP, Murray AS, Terhorst B, Hofer I, Tsukamoto S and Frechen M, 2011. Luminescence dating of the Stratzing loess profile (Austria) — Testing the potential of an elevated temperature post-IR IRSL protocol. Quaternary International 234(1–2): 23–31, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2010.05.018.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.qu....
23.
Thomsen KJ, Murray AS, Jain M and Bøtter-Jensen L, 2008. Laboratory fading rates of various luminescence signals from feldspar-rich sediment extracts. Radiation Measurements 43(9–10): 1474–1486, DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas.2008.06.002.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ra....
24.
Vasiliniuc S, Vandenberghe DAG, Timar-Gabor A, Panaiotu C, Cosma C and van den Haute P, 2012. Testing the potential of elevated temperature post-IR IRSL signals for dating Romanian loess. Quaternary Geochronology 10: 75–80, DOI 10.1016/j.quageo.2012.02.014.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.qu....
25.
Wallinga J, Murray AS and Wintle AG, 2000. The single-aliquot regenerative-dose (SAR) protocol applied to coarse-grain feldspar. Ra-diation Measurements 32(5–6): 529–533, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00091-3.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S135....
27.
Wintle AG and Murray AS, 2006. A review of quartz optically stimulated luminescence characteristics and their relevance in single aliquot regeneration dating protocols. Radiation Measurements 41(4): 369–391, DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas.2005.11.001.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ra....