REVIEW PAPER
Response of radial growth of P. sylvestris var. mongolica (P. sylvestris) and Larix gmelinii (Rupr.) Kuzen (L. gmelinii) to extreme climate and their future growth trends in the Daxing’anling Mountains, northeast China
,
 
Shulong Yu 1,2,3
,
 
Ruibo Zhang 1,2,3
,
 
,
 
Kexiang Liu 1,2,3
,
 
Xiaoxia Gou 1,2,3
,
 
Dong Guo 1,2,3
,
 
Yujiang Yuan 1,2,3
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Desert Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi 830002, China
 
2
Key Laboratory of Tree-ring Physical and Chemical Research of China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi 830002, China
 
3
Key Laboratory of Tree-ring Ecology of Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830002, China
 
4
Xinjiang Climate Center, Urumqi 830002, China
 
 
Submission date: 2024-04-01
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-07-31
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-08-14
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-08-22
 
 
Publication date: 2024-08-22
 
 
Corresponding author
Ruxianguli Man Abudoureheman   

Key Laboratory of Tree-ring Physical and Chemical Research of China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi,China, Institute of Desert Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi ,China, 新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市建国路327号, 830002, 乌鲁木齐市, China
 
 
Geochronometria 2024;51(1)
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The Daxing’anling Mountains are vulnerable to extreme weather and ecological degradation. Forests in this region have been substantially affected by extreme events; however, the pattern of future forest change remains uncertain. To determine the trends and reasons for extreme climate change, reanalysis data were used to assess the potential forest degradation resulting from future extreme climate events. Using tree-ring width chronologies of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica (1952-2015) and Larix gmelinii (Rupr.) Kuzen (1962-2015), we performed a comparative analysis of the relationships between radial growth of these two tree species and extreme indices based on Pearson correlations. The functions between extreme climate and tree ring width were then used in the LASSO algorithm. Using the CMIP6 models under the intermediate emission scenario (SSP2-4.5), we projected the tree ring width of the two species from 2015 to 2100 using calibrated meteorological fields. The tree-ring chronologies of both species were correlated negatively with extreme warm temperature indices and positively with extreme precipitation indices. P. sylvestris responded more significantly to extremely high temperature indices and precipitation, with a certain lag effect. L. gmelinii responded significantly to extremely cold temperature indices. Tree species specificity may explain why the two species show different growth–climate relationships. The growth of P. sylvestris may decrease during extreme climate change conditions, whereas the effect on L. gmelinii future growth is not significant. The predicted growth series in the 2015–2100 period showed that three abnormally high values, six abnormally low values, and one extreme abnormally low value occurred in P. sylvestris, whereas there were two extreme abnormally low values, four abnormally low values, and four abnormally high values in L. gmelinii. Our findings can help predict the resilience and sustainability of forest ecosystems in the face of extreme climate change and contribute to forest management strategies.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The research was supported by the Scientific and Tech-nological Development Fund of Urumqi Institute of De-sert Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration (Urumqi Institute of Desert Meteorology, China Meteoro-logical Administration, KJFZ202306) “Reconstruction of Historical Runoff of Rivers in the Circum-Tarim Basin Based on Tree-Rotor Data, Estimation of Future Trends and Response Research”; China Desert Weather Scientific Research Fund (Urumqi Institute of Desert Meteorology, China Meteoro-logical Administration, Sqj2023003) “Response of radial growth of different tree species to climate extremes and its future growth prediction in the eastern Tianshan Mountains”. Outstanding Youth Science Fund of Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (2022D01E105) “Research on Tree Ring Change and Climate Influence Mechanism of Major Conifer Species in Xinjiang and its Surrounding Areas”; Intergov-ernmental Key Programmes of the National Key R&D Programmes (Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China, 2023YFE0102700) “Study on the Facts of Climate and Hydrological Changes in the Pamir Plateau in the Past Millennium and Future Projec-tions and Responses”; Natural Science Foundation of China (41975095) “Multiple Tree-ring Parameters Based Stability Study of Climatic Response Under the Context of Global Change and Climate Reconstruction for Cen-tral Asia”. Particular thanks are extended to the anony-mous reviewers and editors whose comments and sugges-tions helped us greatly in improving this manuscript. We thank Leonie Seabrook, PhD, from Liwen Bianji (Edanz) (www.liwenbianji.cn), for editing the English text of a draft of this manuscript.
 
REFERENCES (55)
1.
Ali S, Eum HI, Cho J, Li D, Khan F, Dairaku K, Koji Dairaku, Shrestha ML, Hwang S, Nasim W, Khan AI and Fahad S, 2019. Assessment of climate extremes in future projections downscaled by multiple statistical downscaling methods over Pakistan. Atmospheric research 222: 114–133, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.02.009.
 
2.
Allen CD, Macalady AK, Chenchouni H, Bachelet D and McDowell NG, 2010. A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. Forest Ecology and Management 259(4): 660–684, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001.
 
3.
Bonsal BR, Zhang X, Vincent LA and Hogg WD, 2001. Characteristics of Daily and Extreme Temperatures over Canada. Journal of Climate 14(9): 1959–1976, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<1959:CODAET>2.0.CO;2.
 
4.
Chakraborty U and Pradhan D, 2011. High temperature-induced oxidative stress inLens culinaris, role of antioxidants and amelioration of stress by chemical pre-treatments. Journal of Plant Interactions 6(1): 43–52, DOI 10.1080/17429145.2010.513484.
 
5.
Chen H, Sun J, Lin W and Xu H, 2020. Comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 models in simulating climate extremes. Science Bulletin 65(17): 1415–1418, DOI 10.1016/j.scib.2020.05.015.
 
6.
Choi G, Collins DJ, Ren GY, Trewin B, Baldi M, Fukuda Y, Afzaal M, Pianmana T and Purevjav G, 2009. Changes in means and extreme events of temperature and precipitation in the Asia-Pacific Network region, 1955–2007. International Journal of Climatology 29(13): 1906–1925, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13973.
 
7.
Ciais P, Reichstein M, Viovy N, Granier N, Ogée J, Allard V, Aubinet M, Buchmann N, Bernhofer C, Carrara A, Chevallier F, De Noblet N, Friend AD, Friedlingstein P, Grünwald T, Heinesch B, Keronen P, Knohl A, Krinner G, Loustau D, Manca G, Matteucci G, Miglietta F, Ourcival JM, Papale D, Pilegaard K, Rambal S, Seufert G, Soussana JF, Sanz MJ, Schulze ED, Vesala T and Valentini R, 2005. Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature 437(7058): 529–533, DOI 10.1038/nature03972.
 
8.
Cook ER, 1985. A time-series analysis approach to tree-ring standardization (Dendrochronology, forestry, dendroclimatology, autoregressive process). PhD dissertation. Tucson: The University of Arizona.
 
9.
Dannenberg MP, 2021. Modeling tree radial growth in a warming climate: Where, when, and how much do potential evapotranspiration models matter? Environmental Research Letters 16(8): 084017, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac1292.
 
10.
Esper J and Schweingruber FH, 2004. Large-scale treeline changes recorded in Siberia. Geophysical Research Letters 31(6): L06202, DOI 10.1029/2003GL019178.
 
11.
Fritts HC, 1976. Tree rings and climate. Kluwer Academic, New York.
 
12.
Frost HR and Amos CI, 2017. Gene set selection via LASSO penalized regression (SLPR). Nucleic Acids Research 45(12): e114, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkx291.
 
13.
Gao WF, Yao YL, Liang H, Song LL, Sheng HC, Cai TJ and Gao DW, 2019. Emissions of nitrous oxide from continuous permafrost region in the Daxing’an Mountains, Northeast China. Atmospheric Environment 198: 34–45, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.10.045.
 
14.
Gentine P, Guérin M, Uriarte M, Mcdowell NG and Pockman WT, 2016. An allometry-based model of the survival strategies of hydraulic failure and carbon starvation. Ecohydrology 9(3): 529–546, DOI 10.1002/eco.1654.
 
15.
Grissino-Mayer HD, 2001. Evaluating crossdating accuracy: a manual and tutorial for the computer program COFECHA.
 
16.
Guo EL, Zhang JQ, Wang YF, Quan L, Zhang RJ, Zhang F and Zhou M, 2019. Spatiotemporal variations of extreme climate events in Northeast China during 1960–2014. Ecological Indicators 96: 669–683, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.09.034.
 
17.
He M, Yang B, Shishov V, Rossi S, Bräuning A, Ljungqvist FC and Grießinger J, 2018. Projections for the changes in growing season length of tree-ring formation on the Tibetan Plateau based on CMIP5 model simulations. International Journal of Biometeorology 62(4): 631–641, DOI 10.1007/s00484-017-1472-4.
 
18.
He XM, Jiang C, Wang J and Wang XP, 2022. Comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 models performance in simulating temperature in Northeast China. Chinese Journal of Geophysics 65(11): 4194–4207 (Chinese with English abstract), DOI 10.6038/cjg2022P0455.
 
19.
Holm JA, Medvigy DM, Smith B, Dukes JS, Beier C, Mishurov M, Xu XT, Lichstein JW, Allen CD, Larsen KS, Luo YQ, Ficken C, Pockman WT, Anderegg WRL and Rammig A, 2023. Exploring the impacts of unprecedented climate extremes on forestecosystems: hypotheses to guide modeling and experimental studies. Biogeosciences 20(11): 2117–2142, DOI 10.5194/bg-20-2117-2023.
 
20.
Horton DE, Johnson NC, Singh D, Swain DL, Rajaratnam B and Diffenbaugh NS, 2015. Contribution of changes in atmospheric circulation patterns to extreme temperature trends. Nature 522(7557): 465–469, DOI 10.1038/nature14550.
 
21.
IPCC, 2021. Climate change 2021: the physical science basis.
 
22.
Izworska K, Muter E, Matulewski P and Zielonka T, 2023. Tree rings as an ecological indicator of the reaction of Swiss stone pine (Pinus cembra L.) to climate change and disturbance regime in the extreme environment of cliff forests. Ecological Indicators 148: 110102, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110102.
 
23.
Jiang YW, Zhang JH, Han SJ, Chen ZJ, Setälä HK and Yu JH, 2016. Radial Growth Response of Larix gmelinii to Climate along a Latitudinal Gradient in the Greater Khingan Mountains, Northeastern China. Forests 7(12): 295–295, DOI 10.3390/f7120295.
 
24.
Kitudom N, Fauset S, Zhou YY, Zhai F, Li MR and He MJ, 2022. Thermal safety margins of plant leaves across biomes under a heatwave. Science of the Total Environment 806(2): 150416, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150416.
 
25.
Kreyling J, Jentsch A and Beierkuhnlein C, 2011. Stochastic trajectories of succession initiated by extreme climatic events. Ecology Letters 14(8): 758–764, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01637.x.
 
26.
Kulha N, Honkaniemi JH, Barrere J, Brandl S, Cordonnier T, Korhonen KT, Kunstler G, Paul C, Reineking B and Peltoniemi M, 2023. Competition-induced tree mortality across Europe is driven by shade tolerance, proportion of conspecifics and drought. Journal of Ecology 111(10): 2310–2323, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.14184.
 
27.
Larcher W, 1995. Physiological Plant Ecology 3rd ed. Springer, New York, 414., DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-87851-0.
 
28.
Leng WF, He HS, Bu RC and Hu YM, 2007. Sensitivity analysis of the impacts of climate change on the potential distribution of three larch (Larix) species in northeastern China. Journal of Plant Ecology 31(5): 825–833, DOI 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0104.
 
29.
Li J, Chen D, Fu D, Shi J and Jiang M, 1993. Heilongjiang Forests. The Northeast Forestry University Press, Harbin.
 
30.
Li XQ, Zhang LN, Zeng XM, Wang KY, Wang YB, Lu QQ and Liu XH, 2020. Different response of conifer and shrubs radial growth to climate in the middle Loess Plateau. Acta Ecologica Sinica 40(16): 5685–5697 (Chinese with English abstract).
 
31.
O’Donnell AJ, Renton M, Allen KJ and Grierson PF, 2021. The role of extreme rain events in driving tree growth across a continental-scale climatic range in Australia. Ecography 44(7): 1086–1097, DOI 10.1111/ecog.05671.
 
32.
Reichstein M, Ciais P, Papale D, Steven V and Zhao M, 2007. Reduction of ecosystem productivity and respiration during the European summer 2003 climate anomaly: a joint flux tower, remote sensing and modelling analysis. Global Change Biology 13(3): 634–651, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01224.x.
 
33.
Ribbing J, Nyberg J, Caster O and Jonsson EN, 2007. The lasso - a novel method for predictive covariate model building in nonlinear mixed effects models. Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics 34(4): 485–517, DOI 10.1007/s10928-007-9057-1.
 
34.
Roshani SH, Kumar P, Masroor M, Rahaman MH, Rehman S, Ahmed R and Sahana M, 2022. Forest vulnerability to climate change: A review for future research framework. Forests 13(6): 917, DOI 10.3390/f13060917.
 
35.
Sanginés de Cárcer P, Vitasse Y, Peñuelas J, Jassey VEJ, Buttler A and Signarbieux C, 2017. Vapor–pressure deficit and extreme climatic variables limit tree growth. Global Change Biology 24(3): 1108–1122, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13973.
 
36.
Kellomäki S, Strandman H, Heinonen T, Asikainen A, Venäläinen A and Peltola H, 2018. Temporal and Spatial Change in Diameter Growth of Boreal Scots Pine, Norway Spruce, and Birch under Recent-Generation (CMIP5) Global Climate Model Projections for the 21st Century. Forest 9(3): 118, DOI 10.3390/f9030118.
 
37.
Sillmann J and Roeckner E, 2007. Indices for extreme events in projections of anthropogenic climate change. Climatic Change 86 (1–2): 83–104, DOI 10.1007/s10584-007-9308-6.
 
38.
Song Y, Sterck FJ, Zhou XQ, Liu Q, Kruijt B and Poorter L, 2022. Drought resilience of conifer species is driven by leaf lifespan but not by hydraulic traits. New Phytologist 235(3): 978–992, DOI 10.1111/nph.18177.
 
39.
Sumaira Y, Wang XC, Zhao HY, Zhu LJ, Yuan DY and Li ZS, Zhang YD, Ahmad S and Han SJ, 2019. Contrasting climate-growth relationship between Larix gmelinii and Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica along a latitudinal gradient in Daxing’an Mountains, China. Dendrochronologia 58: 125645, DOI 10.1016/j.dendro.2019.125645.
 
40.
Sun GH, Zeng XP, Liu XJ and Zhao P, 2007. Effects of moderate high-temperature stress on photosynthesis in three saplings of the constructive tree species of subtropical forest. Acta Ecologica Sinica 27(4): 1283–1290, DOI 10.1016/S1872-2032(07)60029-8.
 
41.
Thackeray, Chad W, Hall A, Norris J and Chen D, 2022. Constraining the increased frequency of global precipitation extremes under warming. Nature Climate Change 12(5): 441–448, DOI 10.1038/s41558-022-01329-1.
 
42.
Wang X, Wang Y and Lin Q, 2023. Assessing Global Landslide Casualty Risk Under Moderate Climate Change Based on Multiple GCM Projections. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 14: 751–767, DOI 10.1007/s13753-023-00514-w.
 
43.
Wang Y, Li HX, Wang HJ, Sun B and Chen HP, 2021. Evaluation of CMIP6 model simulations of extreme precipitation in China and comparison with CMIP5. Acta Meteorologica Sinica 79(3): 369–386, DOI 10.11676/qxxb2021.031.
 
44.
Wigley TML, Briffa KR and Jones PD, 1984. On the average value of correlated time series, with applications in dendroclimatology and hydrometeorology. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology 23(2): 201–203, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1984)023<0201:OTAVOC>2.0.CO;2.
 
45.
Xu HC, 1998. Daxing’an Mountains Forest, China. Beijing: Science Press.
 
46.
Yan H, Sun YJ, Zhou WY and Liu BH, 2023. Distinctions in drought adaptability and growth decline of Larix gmelinii at different latitudes in Greater Khingan Mountains. Acta Ecologica Sinica 43(10): 3958–3970, DOI 10.5846/stxb202112283696.
 
47.
Yang JJ, Zhang QL, Song WH, Zhuo X, Li ZS, Zhang YD and Wang XC, 2021. Response differences of radial growth of Larix gmelinii and Pinus sylvestris var. Mongolia to climate change in Daxing'an Mountains, Northeast China. The journal of applied ecology 29(3): 380–385.
 
48.
Ying H, Zhang H, Zhao J, Shan Y, Zhang Z and Guo X, 2020. Effects of spring and summer extreme climate events on the autumn phenology of different vegetation types of Inner Mongolia, China, from 1982 to 2015. Ecological Indicators 111: 105974, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105974.
 
49.
Zang C, Hartl-Meier C, Dittmar C, Rothe A and Menzel A, 2014. Patterns of drought tolerance in major European temperate forest trees: climatic drivers and levels of variability. Global Change Biology 20(12): 3767–3779, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12637.
 
50.
Zhang X, Zhou YZ, Ji YH, Yu M, Li XY, Duan J, Wang Y, Gao J and Guo X, 2023a. Climate Factors Affect Above–Belowground Biomass Allocation in Broad-Leaved and Coniferous Forests by Regulating Soil Nutrients. Plants 12(23): 3926–3926, DOI 10.3390/plants12233926.
 
51.
Zhang Y, Piao SL, Sun Y, Rogers BM, Li X, Lian X, Liu Z, Chen A and Peñuelas J, 2023b. Future reversal of warming-enhanced vegetation productivity in the Northern Hemisphere, EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria 24–28, DOI 10.5194/egusphere-egu23-3016.
 
52.
Zhao HY, Gong LJ, Qu HH, Zhu H, Li XF and Zhao F, 2016. The climate change variations in the northern Greater Khingan Mountains during the past centuries. Journal of Geographical Sciences 26(5): 585–602, DOI 10.1007/s11442-016-1287-y.
 
53.
Zhou YL, Zu YG and Yu D, 1997. Vegetation Geography in Northeast China. Science Press, Beijing, 446 (Chinese with English abstract).
 
54.
Zhu HH, Jiang ZL and Li L, 2021. Projection of climate extremes in China, an incremental exercise from CMIP5 to CMIP6. Science Bulletin 66(24): 2528–2537, DOI 10.1016/j.scib.2021.07.026.
 
55.
Zhuang YH, Zhang JY, Wang YH and WU LY, 2018. Variability of Warm Season Surface Air Temperature over Northeastern China and Its Relationships with Sea Surface Temperature and Large-scale Atmospheric Circulation Pattern. Climatic and Environmental Research 23(4): 479–492 (Chinese with English abstract).
 
eISSN:1897-1695
ISSN:1733-8387
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top