RESEARCH PAPER
Tree-Ring Chronologies of Downy Oak (Quercus Pubescens), Pedunculate Oak (Q. Robur) and Sessile Oak (Q. Petraea) in the Bielinek Nature Reserve: Comparison of the Climatic Determinants of Tree-Ring Width
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Climatology and Marine Meteorology, Institute of Marine Sciences, University of Szczecin, Waska 13, 71-415 Szczecin
 
 
Online publication date: 2007-03-06
 
 
Publication date: 2007-01-01
 
 
Geochronometria 2007;26:39-45
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
In 2004-2006, 50 trees of downy oak (Quercus pubescens), pedunculate oak (Q. robur) and sessile oak (Q. petraea) were sampled in the Bielinek Nature Reserve. The following chronologies were established from their tree-ring series: OMS of 212 years (1793-2004) for downy oaks well as D10 of 183 years (1817-1999) and D13 of 211 years (1789-1999) for the two indigenous oak species pedunculate and sessile oak, respectively. These chronologies were used for signature years and response function analyses. All three chronologies were highly similar, which points to identical responses to the ambient meteorological conditions. The radial increment of downy oak depends primarily on the amount of precipitation. A high annual sum of precipitation, copious rain in spring-summer in particular, results in wide tree rings. Precipitation in form of rain and snow in winter, too, enhance tree growth by raising the groundwater level and improving the water supply in the habitat during the subsequent spring. Droughts in spring and summer, coupled with high air temperature, result in narrow rings. The tree-ring width/climate relationships at the two indigenous oak species are very similar to those of downy oak. Responses are, however, more distinct and with a higher statistical significance.
REFERENCES (31)
1.
Baryla J, 2001. Quercus pubescens Willd. In: Polska czerwona ksiega roślin (The Polish Red Book of Plants): 84-85 (in Polish).
 
2.
Blasing TJ, Solomon AM and Duvick DN, 1984. Response functions revisited. Tree-Ring Bulletin 44: 1-15.
 
3.
Boratyński A, 1994. Zarys systematyki dębów (An outline of oak systematics). Sylwan, 10: 73-88 (in Polish).
 
4.
Boratyński A, 1995. Podstawy systematyki dębów Quercus, Wydanie specjalne z okazji otwarcia wystawy, Dab" (Fundamentals of oak systematics. Quercus. A special volume on the occasion of "Oak" exhibition). Ośrodek Kultury Leśnej, Gołuchów: 27-37 (in Polish).
 
5.
Cedro A, 2004. Zmiany klimatyczne na Pomorzu Zachodnim w świetle analizy przyrostów rocznych sosny zwyczajnej, daglezji zielonej i rodzimych gatunków dębów (Climatic changes in Western Pomerania in the light of analysis of tree-ring sequences of Scots Pine, Douglas Fir and native species of Oak). Wydawnictwo In Plus. Szczecin: 30-36; 51-58 (in Polish, with English summary).
 
6.
Cedro A, in press. Dendrochronologiczna analiza sekwencji przyrostów rocznych dębu omszonego występującego na jedynym stanowisku w Polsce w Rezerwacie "Bielinek" w porównaniu do ksztaltowania sie slojów przyrostu rocznego u rodzimych gatunków dąbów (Dendrochronological analysis of tree-ring sequence of downy oak at its sole site in Pland, in the Bielinek Reserve, in relation to radial increment development in indigenous oak species) (in Polish).
 
7.
Celiński F, and Filipek M, 1958. Flora i zespoly roślinne leśnostepowego rezerwatu w Bielinku nad Odrą (The flora and plant communities of the forest-steppe reserve in Bielinek on the Oder). Badania fizjograficzne nad Polską Zachodnią IV: 5-198 (in Polish, with English summary).
 
8.
Chytry M, 1997a. Plant communities of the thermophilous oak forests in Moravia. Preslia 68: 193-240.
 
9.
Chytry M, 1997b. Thermophilous oak forests in the Czech Republic: syntaxonomical revision of the Quercetalia pubescenti-petraeae. Folia Geobotanica Phytotax. 32: 221-258.10.1007/BF02804006.
 
10.
Ciaciura M, 1997a. Przewodnik po rezerwacie przyrody, Bielinek" (A guide to the Bielinek Natural Reserve). Wojewódzki Konserwator Przyrody w Szczecinie: 2-23 (in Polish, with English summary).
 
11.
Ciaciura M, 1997b. Historia badań florystycznych w rezerwacie leśnostepowym, Bielinek" nad Odrą w okresie od 1945 r. do 1997 r. Materialy z sesji okolicznościowej poświęconej obchodom 70-lecia powolania rezerwatu przyrody, Bielinek" (History of floristic research in the Bielinek on the Odra forest-steppe reserve in 1945-1997. In: Proceedings of a special session commemorating the 70th anniversary of the Bielinek Nature Reserve): 11-26 (in Polish).
 
12.
Cook ER and Kairiukstis LA, 1990. Methods of dendrochronology; chapter 3, Data analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers: 97-162.10.1007/978-94-015-7879-0_3.
 
13.
Czubiński Z, 1950. Zagadnienia geobotaniczne Pomorza (Geobotanical problems of Pomerania). Badania fizjograficzne nad Polską Zachodnią (2) 4: 498-517 (in Polish).
 
14.
Eilmann B, Weber P, Rigling A and Eckstein D, 2006. Growth reaction to drought years of Pinus sylvestris L. and Quercus pubescens Willd. on a dry site in the Valais, Switzerland. Dendrochronologia 23: 121-132.10.1016/j.dendro.2005.10.002.
 
15.
Fritts HC, 1976. Tree rings and climate. Academic Press, London-New York-San Francisco, 567 pp.
 
16.
Fritts HC and Xiangding W, 1986. A comparison between response-function analysis and other regression techniques. Tree-Ring Bulletin 46: 31-46.
 
17.
Holmes RJ, 1983. Computer-assisted quality control in tree-ring dating and measurement. Tree-Ring Bulletin 43: 69-78.
 
18.
Holmes RJ, 1994. Dendrochronology Program Library. Users Manual. University of Arizona, Tucson.
 
19.
Huber B, Giertz-Siebenlist V, 1969. Unsere tausendjahrige Eichen-Jahrringchronologie, durchschnittlich 57 (10-150) - flach belegt. Sitzungsbericht der Osterreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathem.-naturw. Kl., Abt. I 178: 37-42.
 
20.
Kaennel M and Schweingruber FH, 1995. Multilingual Glossary of Dendrochronology. WSL FNP, Haupt: 467pp.
 
21.
Krawczyk A, 1995. Program komputerowy TREE RINGS (TREE RINGS Computer software). Kraków.
 
22.
Krawczyk A and Krapiec M, 1995. Dendrochronologiczna baza danych. Materialy II Krajowej Konferencji: Komputerowe wspomaganie badań naukowych (Dendrochronological data base. Proceedings of the Polish Conference on Computer Assistance to Scientific Research). Wroclaw: 247-252 (in Polish).
 
23.
Mindur B, 2000. Dendrometer 1,0 (Dendrometer 1.0 Software). Kraków.
 
24.
Schwarz O, 1937. Monographie der Eichen Europas und des Mittelmeergebietes. Repertorium specierum novarum regni vegetabilis, Sonderbeiheft D. Berlin-Dahlem: 200pp.
 
25.
Staszkiewicz J, 1977. Pozycja systematyczna dębu omszonego (Quercus pubescens Willd.) z rezerwatu leśno-stepowego w Bielinku nad Odrą w oparciu o analizę biometryczna liści (Taxonomic status of the downy oak (Quercus pubescens Willd.) in the forest-steppe reserve at Bielinek on the Odra, as elucidated by biometric analysis of leaves). Fragmenta floristica et geobotanica XXIII, 3-4: 259-276 (in Polish, with French summary).
 
26.
Sukopp H, 1997. Historia powstania rezerwatu przyrody "Bielinek" i jego naukowa eksploracja do roku 1945. (Origins of the Bielinek reserve and its scientific exploration prior to 1945). Materialy z sesji okolicznosciowej poświęconej obchodom 70-lecia powolania rezerwatu przyrody, Bielinek" (Origins of the Bielinek reserve and its scientific exploration prior to 1945). In: Proceedings of a Special Session Commemorating the 70th Anniversary of the Bielinek Nature Reserve): 8-10 (in Polish).
 
27.
Rezerwat Przyrody "Bielinek", 2000. Plan ochrony na okres od 01.01.2000 r. Do 31.12.2019 r. (Bielinek Nature Reserve. Conservation Plan for 1 January 2000 - 31 December 2019). Operat, Toruń: 175pp (in Polish).
 
28.
Walanus A., 2001: DendroGraph - program druku krzywych grubości slojów przyrostów rocznych. Instrukcja obslugi programu DendroGraph (DendroGraph - a software for plotting tree ring width curves. DendroGraph Software User's Manual). Kraków (in Polish): 6pp.
 
29.
Walanus A, 2002. Instrukcja obslugi programu TCS. Program TCS do obliczania lat wskaźnikowych (User's manual of TCS software. TCS software for calculation of signature years). Kraków: 6pp (in Polish).
 
30.
Weber P, Rigling A and Bugmann H, 2005. Differences in drought response of Pinus sylvestris L. and Quercus pubescens Willd. in the Swiss Rhône valley. In: Jansma E, Bräuning A, Gärtner H and Schleser, G, eds, TRACE. Volume 2. Proceedings of the Dendrosymposium 2004. Schriften des Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich 3: 48-52.
 
31.
Zielski A and Krapiec M, 2004. Dendrochronologia (Dendrochronology). PWN Warszawa: 328pp (in Polish).
 
eISSN:1897-1695
ISSN:1733-8387
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top